News: Putting FUN and FRIENDLINESS, FIRST into owning and learning about AMC small bodied cars, primarily Eagles, Spirits and Concords as well as vehicles built in AMC's Mexican subsidiary, VAM.

The AMC Eaglepedia can now be accessed using the buttons found below  This is a comprehensive ever growing archive of information, tips, diagrams, manuals, etc. for the AMC Eagle and other small bodied AMC cars. 

Also a button is now available for our Face Book Group page.


Welcome to the AMC Eagles Nest.  A new site under "old" management -- so welcome to your new home for everything related to AMC Eagles, Spirits and Concords along with opportunities to interact with other AMC'ers.  This site will soon be evolving to look different than it has and we will be incorporating new features we hope you will find useful, entertaining and expand your AMC horizons.

You can now promote your topics at your favorite social media site by clicking on the appropriate icon (top upper right of the page) while viewing the topic you wish to promote.


  • November 21, 2024, 04:20:28 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: The usual AMC bias  (Read 6194 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

amcbigeagle

  • Guest
The usual AMC bias
« on: January 01, 2012, 10:25:21 PM »
This may not be exactly an identity problem but it has to be a sore spot for many of us when confronting those not shall we say AMC savvy. At one time or another we've all had to endure all those derisive comments-"AMC never made anything on their own" "that's a Ford motor" "that's a Chevy motor" "my Cherokee does NOT have an AMC motor in it". So, just for the record, and even though you may think you're preaching to the choir, someone please give us the genealogy of our beloved 258. One particular bit of ammo in our defense would be: where was the 232/258 block cast and is this the same block that evolved into the Jeep 4.0?

Offline shanebo

  • Without "me" its just "aweso"
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 2335
  • Thumbs Up 71
  • 80's chicks are the hottest!
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #1 on: January 02, 2012, 12:58:03 AM »
I worked with a guy that was a die hard mopar guy...He always heckeled me that amc was just a pile of surplus parts from other auto companies....I guess he must have forgot that aside from their full size trucks 95% Chrysler products were rebadged mitsubishi's in the 80's and 90's.
AMC, serving up heaping helpings of AWESOME since 1954

Offline Sunny

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
  • Thumbs Up 29
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #2 on: January 02, 2012, 01:22:36 AM »
The 4.0 Was built at the Kenosha plant according to allpar.

Offline Jurjen

  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 3132
  • Thumbs Up 168
  • Dutch Eagle Preservation Front
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #3 on: January 02, 2012, 06:45:54 AM »
"sparrows fly in flocks, eagles fly alone"

Eagle Wagon Limited 1983, Citroen C-Crosser 2010, Triumph Bonneville 1969, Yamaha XJR1300 1999, Yamaha TX750 1973

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tf0jpiW6tRI

Click for Leeuwarden, Netherlands Forecast" height="90" width="160

Offline IowaEagle

  • AMC Eagle Archivist
  • Administrator
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ******
  • Posts: 31968
  • Thumbs Up 477
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #4 on: January 02, 2012, 10:05:54 AM »
Here is the Nash/AMC I-6 history you asked for, right here in our archives:

http://forums.amceaglenest.com/index.php?topic=5151.0
Click for Toledo, IA Forecast" border="0" height="100" width="150   


Not a Jeep.  Not a Car.  Its an AMC Eagle!

1982 Eagle SX/4 Sport;
1980 Concord DL;
1970 Ambassador 2 Dr HT, SST
2002 Hyundai Santa Fe;
2008 Jeep Patriot Sport - Freedom Drive II

Offline kajsdf

  • Eagle DL
  • ***
  • Posts: 171
  • Thumbs Up 8
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #5 on: January 02, 2012, 11:15:50 AM »
Quote from: wikipedia
The 242 cu in (4 L) engine introduced in 1987 was an evolution of the 258.[11] It had the same 3.895 in (98.9 mm) bore as the 2.5 with a longer 3.414 in (86.7 mm) stroke giving it a displacement of 241.6 cu in (3,959 cc).[12]

The 4.0 is one of AMC's best-known engines.[13] It was one of four AMC engines kept in production when Chrysler bought AMC in 1987. Chrysler engineers continued to refine the engine to reduce noise, vibration, and harshness. The last in the line of the AMC inline sixes, the 4.0 is regarded as one of the best 4x4 off-road engines,[14] and it is known to be able to go more than 300,000 miles (480,000 km) without rebuilding.[15] There are many aftermarket parts available.[citation needed]

Quote from: wikipedia
The 4.0 was discontinued at the end of the 2006 model year, replaced in the redesigned 2007 JK Jeep Wrangler by Chrysler's 3.8 L OHV V6 which originated in the company's minivans. The 4.0 engine was also made in China, where a slightly modified version of the XJ Jeep Cherokee with 2.5 and 4.0 engines were produced alongside the Chinese-produced WJ Grand Cherokee since 2006.

This engine was used in the following vehicles:

    1987–2001 Jeep Cherokee
    1993–2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee
    1987–1990 Jeep Wagoneer
    1987–1992 Jeep Comanche
    1991–2006 Jeep Wrangler
1985 eagle wagon limited
now more limited...
2150 swap...tf727/np229 swap...258 megabuild in the works...

Offline carnuck

  • Having a 727 means never re-doing the trans again
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 3451
  • Thumbs Up 89
  • Near Seattle
    • Virtual Jeep
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #6 on: January 02, 2012, 12:11:47 PM »
The 258 was first produced in 1971 by raising the block height of the earlier 232 motor but it kept the same bell pattern as the earlier motor until 1972. That required a smaller clutch be used and caused a lot of trouble for warranty claims till they changed to the matching bell to the AMC V8s.
   Also of note the 199 block was also raised and coincidentally became 232 (maybe not, given the popularity of the earlier 232)
AMC/Jeep gauges are for amusement only. Any correlation between them and reality is purely coincidental!

Offline mach1mustang351

  • Eagle Sport
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
  • Thumbs Up 20
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #7 on: January 02, 2012, 05:41:17 PM »
I hate all of that too.  I go and see shops for a living and I get all the old mechanics telling me how "worthless" those cars were and how the world will be better when they are all gone for good.  I have to bite my lip a lot. 
Fleet:

1987 AMC Wagon 4.0L, 3" Body lift, AX15, NP242
1981 AMC SX4 Sport
1969 Mustang (A Mach 1 with a 351)
1973 GMC K2500
2007 Suzuki Vstrom

Online vangremlin

  • Administrator
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ******
  • Posts: 4484
  • Thumbs Up 216
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #8 on: January 02, 2012, 06:56:02 PM »
Here is the Nash/AMC I-6 history you asked for, right here in our archives:

http://forums.amceaglenest.com/index.php?topic=5151.0

Pretty fascinating stuff.
1981 Kammback 258 - "Pepe"
1980 Coupe 258 - "Ginger
1972 Gremlin X 304
1978 Gremlin 4 cyl 121 - sold
1964 TBird 390 - sold

Offline IowaEagle

  • AMC Eagle Archivist
  • Administrator
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ******
  • Posts: 31968
  • Thumbs Up 477
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #9 on: January 02, 2012, 07:04:24 PM »
yup, not bad considering so many think AMC did not make their own engines -- and engines for other makes and applications.
Click for Toledo, IA Forecast" border="0" height="100" width="150   


Not a Jeep.  Not a Car.  Its an AMC Eagle!

1982 Eagle SX/4 Sport;
1980 Concord DL;
1970 Ambassador 2 Dr HT, SST
2002 Hyundai Santa Fe;
2008 Jeep Patriot Sport - Freedom Drive II

68AMXGOPAC

  • Guest
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2012, 09:34:21 AM »
yup, not bad considering so many think AMC did not make their own engines -- and engines for other makes and applications.

Not to be highjacker, but good to see you back - IOWA !!

amcbigeagle

  • Guest
Re: The usual AMC bias
« Reply #11 on: January 03, 2012, 07:53:49 PM »
Thanks everyone for the great info. Very useful. In fact, I'm thinking of a wallet-size version so when confronted by one of those numbskulls, I can, data in hand, say with confidence, "Oh Yeah? Well let me tell you......."

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk