News: Putting FUN and FRIENDLINESS, FIRST into owning and learning about AMC small bodied cars, primarily Eagles, Spirits and Concords as well as vehicles built in AMC's Mexican subsidiary, VAM.

The AMC Eaglepedia can now be accessed using the buttons found below  This is a comprehensive ever growing archive of information, tips, diagrams, manuals, etc. for the AMC Eagle and other small bodied AMC cars. 

Also a button is now available for our Face Book Group page.


Welcome to the AMC Eagles Nest.  A new site under "old" management -- so welcome to your new home for everything related to AMC Eagles, Spirits and Concords along with opportunities to interact with other AMC'ers.  This site will soon be evolving to look different than it has and we will be incorporating new features we hope you will find useful, entertaining and expand your AMC horizons.

You can now promote your topics at your favorite social media site by clicking on the appropriate icon (top upper right of the page) while viewing the topic you wish to promote.


  • November 23, 2024, 05:41:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: SX/4 AMC-258  (Read 8744 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline SX/290

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Thumbs Up 1
SX/4 AMC-258
« on: June 27, 2011, 07:24:17 PM »
What is the power ratngs for the 258 I6 ? ? ?

Just curious as the HP n TQ numbers.

Mike
1953 Studebaker M275.
1962 GMC 4500.
1969 AMC AMX-390.
1982 AM-Jeep J-5500.
1982 AMC Eagle SX/290.
1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343.
1992 GTA trans AM.
2007 Honda Rubicon ATV.

Offline Sunny

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
  • Thumbs Up 29
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #1 on: June 27, 2011, 08:55:54 PM »
Pretty bad  ;D

From what I researched before..
110 Horsepower
205 TQ
0-60: 15.2 seconds [15.8 Auto]
1/4 Mile: 19.6 seconds [20.5 Auto]
Top speed: 88MPH.

Offline Draekon

  • Eagle Sport
  • ****
  • Posts: 368
  • Thumbs Up 22
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #2 on: June 27, 2011, 09:29:24 PM »
Pretty bad  ;D

From what I researched before..
110 Horsepower
205 TQ
0-60: 15.2 seconds [15.8 Auto]
1/4 Mile: 19.6 seconds [20.5 Auto]
Top speed: 88MPH.

Its not too horrible considering its an '80s car.  My '84 firebird came with 150hp/245ft-lbs tq on the stock 305 v8.  Take into consideration the .8L size difference between the motors, and its not far off.

The 258 is 84.5% the size of a 305, so 84.5% of 245ft lbs is 207ft lbs, right where the 258 sits.  The horsepower doesn't come out to be as close, but the torque curve of the 258 is going to put the torque down lower in the RPMs, and HP is a function of RPMs.

Overall, I'd say not bad for an early 80s motor.  But is there room for improvement?  Definitely!

Offline Sunny

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
  • Thumbs Up 29
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #3 on: June 27, 2011, 10:41:13 PM »
LG4's [305s] are only good for boat anchors anyway.
Even the HO 305's were 190HP with a 4barrel.
TPI/TBI made an improvement on that.
TPI's made GREAT torque, horrible power in upper RPM's


I'll agree the 80's were not too kind to power numbers though.

It's really a shame AMC never offered a small block Eagle.
Even a 304 would have done wonder's.

I know the Eagle wasn't built for speed, or power.. but 0-60 in almost 16 seconds for an auto, at full throttle?..

Even your 84 Firebird did it in about half that.

Does it really seem THAT slow driving it?.. that's just..horrible?

Now I know why the 4.0 conversion is so popular, and will be my first mod.  ;D

Offline thereverendbill

  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 2334
  • Thumbs Up 85
  • as seen on the internet
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #4 on: June 27, 2011, 11:07:57 PM »
the HEI and MC 2100 really wakes up these motors.  I have yet to do any sort of highway driving with the new carb but up and down my lane with it I can feel the difference 
1980 Eagle 2 door sedan (future solid axle swap)
1981 Eagle Kammback (restoration in progress)
1983 SX/4 SOLD
1983 Eagle Limited wagon  *For Sale* SOLD
1988 Jeep Comanche Pioneer (daily driver)
Click for YOUR TOWN, STATE Forecast" border="0" height="100" width="150

another amc forum
www.amcevolution.com

Offline Sunny

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
  • Thumbs Up 29
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #5 on: June 27, 2011, 11:36:02 PM »
the HEI and MC 2100 really wakes up these motors.  I have yet to do any sort of highway driving with the new carb but up and down my lane with it I can feel the difference 

I've actually heard that.
I actually wondered if it was just a case of AMC threw them together, but going bankrupt couldn't afford to give them the parts they really wanted to?

I've never been a fan of Carter carbs.

Offline BenM

  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 1512
  • Thumbs Up 74
  • Pittsburgh, PA
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #6 on: June 28, 2011, 04:10:18 PM »
They were working on the new 2.5 4 at the time, and shortly after that the 4.0. Had things gone differently in the late 80's, AMC may have had the 4.0 in everything by 1990, and really been able to ride the SUV wave.

I think they were ready to drop the 258 as soon as they could get a 4.0 on the market and were just trying to keep things going for another couple of years.
NSS#47184

1987 AMC Eagle Sedan -- 1976 Pacer Coupe -- 1968 Pontiac Tempest Custom S -- 1940 Mercury (& a 2002 Jetta Turbodiesel, 5 spd., the Wife's Daily Driver)

Offline eaglefreek

  • Moderators
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • *****
  • Posts: 4011
  • Thumbs Up 209
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #7 on: June 28, 2011, 04:46:54 PM »
LG4's [305s]  .
Even a 304 would have done wonder's.

.............

Now I know why the 4.0 conversion is so popular, and will be my first mod.  ;D

Strike Eagle installed a 304 in his eagle and was disappointed. He has since installed a 4.0L and is quite happy.
1986 AMC Eagle Wagon 4.2L/4.0L head, AW4,NP242, Chrysler 8.25" rear.
1981 AMC Eagle Wagon As Seen On TV  Lost In Transmission


 

"I know he'd be a poorer man, if he never saw an eagle fly,
Rocky mountain high"  John Denver
Click for Fayetteville,TN Forecast" border="0" height="100" width="150

Offline Budwisr

  • Eagle DL
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
  • Thumbs Up 24
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #8 on: June 28, 2011, 06:59:10 PM »
the HEI and MC 2100 really wakes up these motors.  I have yet to do any sort of highway driving with the new carb but up and down my lane with it I can feel the difference 

I've actually heard that.
I actually wondered if it was just a case of AMC threw them together, but going bankrupt couldn't afford to give them the parts they really wanted to?

I've never been a fan of Carter carbs.
AMC never went bankrupt. Offically they "merged" with Chrysler but in reality Chrysler bought them out. Then of course Chrysler did go bankrupt in 2009.
Bud
 1981 SX/4
 1983 SX/4
 1987 Wrangler
 1970 AMX
 1980 Spirit AMX

68AMXGOPAC

  • Guest
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #9 on: June 28, 2011, 07:05:45 PM »
The stock 304 isn't much over on the I6.A set of headers, high rise intake and 4 barrell will wake it up, but still low in HP range for what you can squeeze out of the I6 , and it still looks stock on the outside. I have been checking out Titan Motors website and drooling for weeks now.............

Offline Sunny

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 558
  • Thumbs Up 29
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #10 on: June 28, 2011, 07:19:51 PM »


 AMC never went bankrupt. Offically they "merged" with Chrysler but in reality Chrysler bought them out. Then of course Chrysler did go bankrupt in 2009.

I meant they were going bankrupt, not had declared.
Especially when Renault owned them and was experiencing severe financial issues.

Maybe it's a curse? :P

Offline El Matador

  • AMC Freak
  • Eagle Turbo Diesel
  • *******
  • Posts: 1395
  • Thumbs Up 111
  • SubaWHO?
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #11 on: June 28, 2011, 07:24:05 PM »
Top speed: 88MPH

Just enough for the flux capacitor to kick in.  ;)

I actually wondered if it was just a case of AMC threw them together, but going bankrupt couldn't afford to give them the parts they really wanted to?

AMC was actually a profitable company in its final couple of years prior to the Chrysler buyout.  Because of this, Renault initially refused :Lee the Bulldozer Boy:'s purchase offer.  Then the president of Renault was assassinated in Paris, and his successor resumed the talks with Iacocca.  And the rest, as they say...  :(

EDIT: Funny how a certain name gets edited out by the profanity filter and changed to "Lee the bulldozer boy".  :P
« Last Edit: June 28, 2011, 07:26:12 PM by El Matador »
1973 Matador 2 door
1979 Concord 2 door
1980 Concord 4 door
1980 Eagle 2 door
1980 Eagle 2 door
1981 Eagle SX/4
1981 Eagle wagon
1982 Concord 2 door
1987 Eagle wagon

Offline Budwisr

  • Eagle DL
  • ***
  • Posts: 254
  • Thumbs Up 24
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #12 on: June 28, 2011, 07:44:19 PM »
I guess you could say AMC was "going bankrupt" throughout it's whole existence. Financial "difficulties" aided AMCs innovation in a lot of ways. Sorry, it's a pet peeve of mine when anyone tells me AMC went "under", "down the toilet" or "bankrupt". As El Matador says, they were in pretty good shape when Chrysler bought them. They just built a new state-of-the-art factory, had a new line of cars coming out and the Jeep division was booming with the new Wrangler and the new Grand Cherokee not far behind. They were actually under valued and that made them a great buy. Sometimes being too successful leads to ones demise.
Bud
 1981 SX/4
 1983 SX/4
 1987 Wrangler
 1970 AMX
 1980 Spirit AMX

Offline AMCKen

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 556
  • Thumbs Up 13
    • American Motors Club of Alberta
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #13 on: June 29, 2011, 12:38:12 AM »
the HEI and MC 2100 really wakes up these motors.  I have yet to do any sort of highway driving with the new carb but up and down my lane with it I can feel the difference 

How much improvement is from the different carb or just from a richer mixture? ; )
Any engine jetted lean for emissions will wake up with jet a metering rod fixes. I've done a couple BBDs and they do work well for me.
39Master85w.partscar,67Marlin343,68AMX343,70Machine,73Matador2drht401,
73-74-75-76GremlinXs,75PacerX,76Hornet2dsd,76-77Matadorcpes,
2-77AMXs304,78AMX304,78GremlinGT,78Concordsw,79Concordhb,79PacerDL304,
2-79AMXs304/401,2-80AMXs258/401,80SpiritDL304, 80Eagle4dsdn,3-81SX4s,
81SpiritGT,2-81Concord4dsd,82Eaglesw,2-85Eaglesw,2-80J20/360,85J10/258,2-88Eaglesw,
94Sentra2dsd   (42)

Offline SX/290

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 27
  • Thumbs Up 1
Re: SX/4 AMC-258
« Reply #14 on: June 29, 2011, 12:15:01 PM »
The 304 was a low compression smog dawg 150hp n 225tq, the 290HO in net power made 165hp n 240tq when figuring in a 20% drop from gross to net ;-)

Now your comparing an 8.5:1 to a 10:1 compression ratio and a 2bbl (304) ? To a 4bbl (290) !

The 4L only hit a max power of 195hp n 235tq so torque wise the 290 was hangin right with it, Now if ya installed the multipoint injection like the 4L had and the 290Lo stays right with it and the 290hipo surpasses the 4L.

Well there lots of other goodies that work on the 290's you make it a 295-297ci 12.5:1 duel quad 7,500rpm beast should one so choose to do so ;-)

Mike
1953 Studebaker M275.
1962 GMC 4500.
1969 AMC AMX-390.
1982 AM-Jeep J-5500.
1982 AMC Eagle SX/290.
1988 AM-Jeep MJ-343.
1992 GTA trans AM.
2007 Honda Rubicon ATV.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk