News: Putting FUN and FRIENDLINESS, FIRST into owning and learning about AMC small bodied cars, primarily Eagles, Spirits and Concords as well as vehicles built in AMC's Mexican subsidiary, VAM.

The AMC Eaglepedia can now be accessed using the buttons found below  This is a comprehensive ever growing archive of information, tips, diagrams, manuals, etc. for the AMC Eagle and other small bodied AMC cars. 

Also a button is now available for our Face Book Group page.


Welcome to the AMC Eagles Nest.  A new site under "old" management -- so welcome to your new home for everything related to AMC Eagles, Spirits and Concords along with opportunities to interact with other AMC'ers.  This site will soon be evolving to look different than it has and we will be incorporating new features we hope you will find useful, entertaining and expand your AMC horizons.

You can now promote your topics at your favorite social media site by clicking on the appropriate icon (top upper right of the page) while viewing the topic you wish to promote.


  • June 26, 2024, 04:30:51 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?  (Read 2783 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline George Mann

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Thumbs Up 3
MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« on: October 01, 2012, 10:15:07 AM »
What is your preference, and why?
1985 Eagle Wagon

Offline Baskinator

  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 526
  • Thumbs Up 31
  • Limerick, PA
Re: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« Reply #1 on: October 01, 2012, 03:10:19 PM »
I'm pretty sure I've had both, and iirc the Moog has a nicer, thicker rubber boot. I generally like Moog parts because a lot of them are "problem-solver". However, Raybestos are usually pretty good as well.
1982 AMC Eagle SX/4 (Work In Progress)

Photobucket Album: http://s1237.photobucket.com/albums/ff479/Baskinator/

Offline mach1mustang351

  • Eagle Sport
  • ****
  • Posts: 481
  • Thumbs Up 20
Re: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« Reply #2 on: October 01, 2012, 09:49:05 PM »
Moog for me.  I had a bunch of 2 year old Spicer (Raybestos) stuff go south on me last summer and it left a bad taste in my mouth.  I installed Moog and a year later and double the mileaI heard ge as before no issues.  I heard that Raybestos started taking a percent of their parts and reboxing over seas product.  No good source, but somethign I heard out there.   
Fleet:

1987 AMC Wagon 4.0L, 3" Body lift, AX15, NP242
1981 AMC SX4 Sport
1969 Mustang (A Mach 1 with a 351)
1973 GMC K2500
2007 Suzuki Vstrom

Offline DaemonForce

  • Grease Magnet
  • Eagle Limited
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
  • Thumbs Up 8
Re: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« Reply #3 on: October 01, 2012, 11:36:34 PM »
Moog generally has higher quality parts. I started with bad upper joints and this replacement became my first job on this vehicle. Picked Moog over Mevotech and Ingalls. I've never heard of Raybestos and judging from what has been said here, I don't want them either.
1983 Limited
AMC 258C {R2:27.Jun.13}
Carter 2681 {R2:28.Oct.12}
TorqueFlite A998 {R6: -20.Apr.12}
NP129 {R2:28.Apr.12}
M35-273 {???}
Compression: 0
Corrected Idle: 0RPM

Rebuild:
???

Offline George Mann

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 70
  • Thumbs Up 3
Re: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« Reply #4 on: October 02, 2012, 08:00:41 AM »
OK, but were these an old re-badged Spicer product or the new ones with synthetic bearings?
1985 Eagle Wagon

Offline carnuck

  • Having a 727 means never re-doing the trans again
  • AMC Eagles Den Addicted
  • ********
  • Posts: 3451
  • Thumbs Up 89
  • Near Seattle
    • Virtual Jeep
Re: MOOG or RAYBESTOS Ball Joints?
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2012, 02:28:05 PM »
Look on the box AND the part to see where it's from before buying if possible
AMC/Jeep gauges are for amusement only. Any correlation between them and reality is purely coincidental!

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk