AMC Eagle Den Forum

The Mighty 258 => The Engine => Topic started by: DaemonForce on March 03, 2012, 06:57:26 AM

Title: Smaller cam?
Post by: DaemonForce on March 03, 2012, 06:57:26 AM
I have the stock AMC cam in my 258 and I'm finally rebuilding the spare. I'm thinking about going to a REALLY small 240H (http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/cam-specs/Details.aspx?csid=7&sb=0) Comp Cam in the near future. Extreme specs like 240/248 duration make me a little uneasy but I'm willing to bet it's very streetable. I've decided that if I need more low end torque I'll be using a low gear transfer case to do it. 95% of the time this bird is on the freeway doing completely insane distance trips and it's unusual for me to tow anything anyway so I think it's a pretty good idea. There may be the rare day where I'm finally towing a Javelin or FSJ or something but I figure I'll have a low gear transfer case by then too. I have a feeling this sounds completely ridiculous to most of you. If it is, let me know. ::)
Title: Re: Smaller cam?
Post by: eaglefreek on March 03, 2012, 07:15:55 AM
I wouldn't call that a small cam. It would be a significant improvent over stock. Juzt don't use the Comp Cam springs if you want the cam to last. Stock springs will be fine.
Title: Re: Smaller cam?
Post by: DaemonForce on March 03, 2012, 08:08:54 AM
Which ones? I have the 258 head but I intend to rebuild a 242 head I pulled last month and replace the rockers and valves.
Title: Re: Smaller cam?
Post by: carnuck on March 03, 2012, 10:32:32 AM
 and springs are pretty close. I'd run the ones with the least miles or have never been overheated. You need to pull the head to do the cam anyways.