News:
Putting FUN and FRIENDLINESS, FIRST into owning and learning about AMC small bodied cars, primarily Eagles, Spirits and Concords as well as vehicles built in AMC's Mexican subsidiary, VAM.

  The AMC Eaglepedia can now be accessed using the buttons found below  This is a comprehensive ever growing archive of information, tips, diagrams, manuals, etc. for the AMC Eagle and other small bodied AMC cars. 

Also a button is now available for our Face Book Group page.


Welcome to the AMC Eagles Nest.  A new site under "old" management -- so welcome to your new home for everything related to AMC Eagles, Spirits and Concords along with opportunities to interact with other AMC'ers.  This site will soon be evolving to look different than it has and we will be incorporating new features we hope you will find useful, entertaining and expand your AMC horizons.  And, if you were you banned at another AMC Eagle Forum and cannot log in here?  Let us know and we will fix it for you. 

You can now promote your topics at your favorite social media site by clicking on the appropriate icon (top upper right of the page) while viewing the topic you wish to promote.


  • April 03, 2020, 03:08:14 AM

Login with username, password and session length

Author Topic: PCV valve routing looks wrong?  (Read 331 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Brownc62

  • Hatchling
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Thumbs Up 1
PCV valve routing looks wrong?
« on: December 09, 2019, 01:54:41 AM »
Hello all, I’m an Eagle newbie and this is my first post. I’ve been gaining tons of knowledge from this website so far. I’m working on reviving an ‘82 wagon with the 258 and the first anomaly I have come across is the vacuum line routing to the PCV valve.

The valve has a “T” split with one line running to the back of the carb which is correct according to the vacuum diagram I found on here. The other end runs to the manifold and plugs into another “T” fitting with the power brakes. According to the diagram, this line should run into the “canister purge” instead.

My question is will this allow the PCV system to still work properly?  Is the system essentially just getting double the manifold vacuum drawn on it with this setup? Or is it canceling out vacuum and causing the system to not work at all? The engine does seem to have some blow by, so I’m curious if this is an indictor that it isn’t working properly.

Just some background info. The car has been sitting for almost 2 decades because the previous owner could not get it to run higher than an idle. I threw a new carb and fuel pump on which didn’t fix the issue. I then disconnected the catalytic converter and that ended up fixing the problem. Revs up great now. It was totally plugged up! Wondering if that has anything to do with a malfunctioning PCV system?

Thanks for any insight!

Offline Still Pat

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 115
  • Thumbs Up 4
Re: PCV valve routing looks wrong?
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2019, 10:11:28 AM »
From what I recall, mine was the same on BlackBird. Don't recall looking at this one.

Offline MIPS

  • Eagle
  • **
  • Posts: 73
  • Thumbs Up 12
Re: PCV valve routing looks wrong?
« Reply #2 on: December 09, 2019, 03:21:17 PM »
Because both vacuum ports are manifold and basically pulling vacuum from the same point in the manifold you should not have an issue with the PCV in this configuration. I'm assuming you've had the charcoal canister deleted?

Vacuum routing on the T for the brake booster should also run to the cruise control, CTO switch, vacuum solenoid manifold for the secondary air and sol-vac systems and one of the vacuum switches.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2019, 03:27:10 PM by MIPS »

Offline Taylor

  • Administrator
  • Eagle DL
  • ******
  • Posts: 225
  • Thumbs Up 14
Re: PCV valve routing looks wrong?
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2019, 09:07:51 AM »
If you still have the factory bbd carburetor this might help.
2010 Toyota Rav4 Daily Driver (better mileage)
1985 AMC Eagle Limited wagon 🖖🏼🦅
2005 Ford Excursion 4X4 wife's around town daily driver.

 

SMF spam blocked by CleanTalk