AMC Eagle Den Forum

The Mighty 258 => The Engine => Topic started by: Canoe on September 06, 2012, 05:23:38 PM

Title: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 06, 2012, 05:23:38 PM
I've read that if you're going to torque the 4.0 head to its 110 lbs., and you're having a tired 258 block bored as part of its rebuild to take this head, you have to bore with a boring deck torqued to 110 so the newly bored cylinders won't go out of round when the 4.0 head is torqued to 110 lbs..

Question: for this newly bored block, until you get a 4.0 head, can you run it with the stock 4.2 head torqued to 75 lbs?
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: mudkicker715 on September 06, 2012, 05:33:25 PM
i never done this with my 2  strokers. really do not understand what your saying. however i know i went past 75 on both. my first is standard bore. the other is bored 60 over. the first is a 7120 head the other is a iirc 2126 head. however theses utilize the 4.0 block.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 06, 2012, 06:16:22 PM
From what I've read, the 4.0 head wants 110 lbs..
But, you can't take a standard 258 block, re-bored or stock, and torque the 4.0 head to it's 110 lbs..This much torque will distort the stock 258 block, causing the cylinders to be out of round.

To get around this, a boring deck is torqued in place of the head, at 110 lbs, so the boring is done with the "head"/block torqued to 110 lbs.

My question: if this is done, will it run with a stock head at stock torque?
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 06, 2012, 06:18:06 PM
But, maybe you can answer this for me. If I'm going to get my stock 258 block bored 030 over, how does this compare to a stroker of a 258 block, both in spec and in cost?
Can it run with a stock 258 head for now, and go to the 4.0 HO head later?
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: mudkicker715 on September 06, 2012, 06:21:15 PM
i replied on another thread of yours
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 07, 2012, 12:11:43 AM
You have to run the 1/2" head bolts to get 110 ft lbs. The early/mid '80s 4.2L ran 7/16" which will shear off before 110 ft lbs. If you are building a stroker, then you want the boring plate on the block when it's machined. Not really needed on a stock rebuild.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 01:01:11 PM
My "stroker" is an overbored 258 with 4.0 head. Usually when people say stroker they mean a 4.0 block with a 4.2 crank. The 258 block can be overbored to 4.5 but a 242 block can be overbored to 4.9. I personally don't mind calling a 4.5 258 block with 4.0 head a stroker because it performs exactly the same as a 4.5 stroker made from a 242 block. In the end it's really a combination of 258 crank and 4.0 head that makes the difference, so I personally don't mind using "stroker" to describe a 258 block as long as a 4.0 head is on it. It's just easy to confuse people because not everyone uses the word the same way.

On my engine I have 7/16" head bolts. I like that better because they are reuseable. The larger 1/2" head bolts are meant to be torque to yield. "Torque to yield" essentially means that the bolt is designed to fatigue and be damaged the very first time you tighten them in an effort to make a more consistant pressure across the head gasket. That was the reason for the higher torque numbers. You're actually supposed to break the bolt a little bit as you put them on. Since you have to buy an expensive set of head bolts each time you rebuild the engine with the larger size so I plan on sticking with the smaller size. I only replace them if they are high mileage.

You'll need an adaptor as you bolt the 4.0 head on to the 258 block with the 258 head bolts. For this I use two old 4.0 head bolts. About half of the driver side head bolts on every 4.0 are 7/16 threads at the top and 1/2 threads at the bottom. I ground the hex head off the shank of the bolt, leaving both sets of threads intact. I flipped the head bolts upside down and screwed them into the block. The gasket and head slid perfectly down the shank of the larger head bolts into perfect position. I snugged up all the other head bolts before removing my homemade adaptors and filling those holes with head bolts too. It works much better than the spacers Hesco sells and it makes for a much more reliable head gasket placement. The best part is that the adaptors themselves are made from junk you can usually take home for free when you pull your donor 4.0 head at the junkyard.

Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 07, 2012, 01:36:59 PM
You have to run the 1/2" head bolts to get 110 ft lbs. The early/mid '80s 4.2L ran 7/16" which will shear off before 110 ft lbs.
Mine's an '86 Eagle, but the head bolts are 1/2", making me suspect it's not the original block.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 07, 2012, 01:39:44 PM
... The 258 block can be overbored to 4.5
I'm stuck on the road, so adding in the adaptor to put a 4.0 block onto my trans along with finding a 4.0 block... I already have the 258 block sitting here.


A 258 block:
stock, is 4.2
over bored 030 is ______?
over bored ___ is 4.5

So I tell the shop I want it over-bored by ____ to ____ to get 4.5?

Stock cam or otherwise?

Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 01:49:20 PM
I think the 1/2" head bolts started in late '87 at the same time they switched to the aluminum valve cover eventually used with the 4.0. Both of my '87 Eagles still have 7/16" head bolts and the plastic valve cover. I do not know if those late 4.2 blocks use torque-to-yield bolts. I bet a service manual from 1988 or a 1989 YJ would tell you if those bolts needed to be torqued to the bigger 4.0 value or the smaller 4.2 value. That is worth looking into if you plan on using the old head bolts.

My engine is either .30 or .60. It was rebuilt professionally about 6 months and 400 miles before I purchased my Spirit. The original owner kept calling it a 4.5L. I'm about to install it into my SX4 because the Spirit is getting a V8. I can't tell you the exact cubic inches that correspond to both overbores, or the liter amount down to three decimal places. I would like to know that myself.

Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 07, 2012, 02:04:26 PM
I won't be reusing the old head bolts. Not worth the risk with all I'm stuck spending.

My 1/2" head has the plastic valve cover. But, one of the mechanics here was taught by an old AMC mechanic and had an Eagle for a few years. He said that the platic valve cover was designed to run without a gasket: completely clean valve cover intent surface and the bonding surface of the head with brake cleaner, then apply a 3/8" bead of RTV silicone gasket maker, set in place, press lightly so RTV coats entire bonding surface, let sit until cured, then torque. Claims this never leaks oil, but that the oil filler cap always will...
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 07, 2012, 04:22:57 PM
RTV grey will work for quite awhile, but "the Right Stuff" works AWESOME on non-cracked plastic cover to seal it up.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 07, 2012, 04:25:34 PM
... The 258 block can be overbored to 4.5
I'm stuck on the road, so adding in the adaptor to put a 4.0 block onto my trans along with finding a 4.0 block... I already have the 258 block sitting here.


A 258 block:
stock, is 4.2
over bored 030 is ______?
over bored ___ is 4.5

So I tell the shop I want it over-bored by ____ to ____ to get 4.5?

Stock cam or otherwise?



No adapter for 4.0L to 4.2L trans or front axle. Change the oil pan from the 4.0L to the one from the 4.2L, clean the axle mount holes in the block before installing. Not all 4.2Ls can be bored (need to check for core shift) and 1/2" headbolts started coming back in early '87 model year according to the Jeep guys I've talked with.

For the cam, if you plan EFI later, use the aftermarket performance one or the ping monster will haunt you.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 07, 2012, 05:36:42 PM
No adapter for 4.0L to 4.2L trans or front axle. Change the oil pan from the 4.0L to the one from the 4.2L, clean the axle mount holes in the block before installing.
Good to know.
So I could drop a 4.0 right in onto the auto-trans, using the 258 intake for the carb, using the 4.0 exhaust manifold patched into the 258 exhaust.
Understand only issue should be mounting the power steering pump?

Not all 4.2Ls can be bored (need to check for core shift)
Now you're scaring me. What is core shift?

For the cam, if you plan EFI later, use the aftermarket performance one or the ping monster will haunt you.
No EFI planned.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: eaglefreek on September 07, 2012, 08:59:51 PM
Only overbore enough to get a good bore. Not much is gained by overboring more than needed.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 09:38:25 PM
You can bolt the 4.0 right up to everything. The trick is deciding to keep the 4.0 serpantine belt or not. I personally want all my cars, 4.0 or 4.2, to eventually be serpantine. I hate squeaking V belts and that problem doesn't exist with the serpantine. If you use the 4.0 belts you'll need to keep the original 4.0 harmonic dampner, AC pump, and power steering pump. That power steering pump is compatible with the Eagle steering hardware.

Realize that a 4.0 block doesn't have a fuel pump hole. That's the biggest difference between the two. If you bolt on a carb to a 4.0 you'll need a low pressure electric fuel pump to feed the carb.

You'll always need an Eagle oil pan and oil pickup tube, even if you're using a 4.2 from a Spirit or Jeep. The 4.0 is the same way. The Eagle stuff goes right unto any inline 6 1970 to 2006.

Some people will tell you that 4.2 exhaust and intake manifolds don't work on a 4.0. I disagree. The problem seems to be the bolt hole in the front of the manifold doesn't line up anymore. The gasket surface itself looks like it lines up fine. In my CJ8 I have a 4.2 cast exhaust manifold with a Hesco 4.0 intake. That bolt that used to go to the 4.2 intake was just moved and some work with the grinder trimmed the power steering bracket. Its using 4.2 V belt accessories. My Spirit had the opposite. It had a 4.0 exhaust manifold with a 4.2 intake manifold. I don't see why a 4.2 intake and exhaust won't work on a 4.2 head except for moving that same hole and trimming the bracket like my CJ8 has.

Any inline 6 AMC flexplate or flywheel is compatible with any inline 6, 1971 to 2006. (1970 hardware works too for manual transmissions but not automatic). It just bolts on and the trans just bolts on exactly the same. It's only the V8's that have a slight difference. Those flexplates and flywheels look exactly the same and bolt on exactly the same, but they're balanced differently and will vibrate severly if you accidently use one on an inline 6.

I agree you should never overbore any more than necessary. The only reason to overbore to .60 is if the engine has already had a great deal of mileage on a previous .30 overbore. Realize that AMC blocks accept new rings quite well even if they have 200+ miles and you need a ridge reamer to take off the ridge on the bore. It's up to you if you want the peace of mind or not. Realistically most AMC engines would function well with just new rings and no overbore during periodic rebuilds.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 09:47:50 PM
My 1/2" head has the plastic valve cover.

Sounds to me like you think you have 1/2" bolts but actually have 7/16" bolts, especially since your Eagle is a 1982. They look so darn close. Try putting a tap on them and you'll know for sure. I confuse my 4.0 head bolts all the time as 4.2 bolts.

An even easier test is to take the accessory head bolt and take the nut at the top and try it on the threads at the bottom. If the threads are exactly the same top and bottom its 7/16". If its different its 1/2" bottom and 7/16" top. Those are the only two possible combinations since 4.0 head bolts still used 7/16" threads at the top compatible with all the old 4.2 hardware. A 4.2 would have at least one of those double ended head bolts at the front of the driver side for attaching a Vbelt pulley and a 4.0 would have at least three of them for the wiring harness plastic box to snap to.

I'm pretty sure all plastic valve cover engines are the lightened 1981 to early 1987 blocks with 7/16 headbolts. I guess its plausible that someone used a 1988 short block and the 1982 head with the holes slightly enlarged, but it's much more likely you're just wrong about your own head bolts.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: vangremlin on September 07, 2012, 10:07:25 PM

Any inline 6 AMC flexplate or flywheel is compatible with any inline 6, 1971 to 2006. (1970 hardware works too for manual transmissions but not automatic). It just bolts on and the trans just bolts on exactly the same. It's only the V8's that have a slight difference. Those flexplates and flywheels look exactly the same and bolt on exactly the same, but they're balanced differently and will vibrate severly if you accidently use one on an inline 6.


My experience is that you should not interchange the bolts that hold a flexplate on with the bolts that hold a flywheel on.  Keep flexplate bolts with flexplate, flywheel bolts with flywheel.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 10:26:22 PM
Flexplate bolts are about a half inch shorter than flywheel bolts. Keep the bolts and flexplate or flywheel with the transmission it originally came with as you swap engines.

In a related note, AW4 flexplates "work" with a TF998. They work for about a week until the 4 mm difference in backspacing causes your torque converter to push on the transmission pump, breaking it. I've seen two people on forums do that by mistake. If you use a 4.0 long block don't be tempted to leave the 4.0 flexplate on.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: mudkicker715 on September 07, 2012, 10:34:06 PM
Flexplate bolts are about a half inch shorter than flywheel bolts. Keep the bolts and flexplate or flywheel with the transmission it originally came with as you swap engines.

In a related note, AW4 flexplates "work" with a TF998. They work for about a week until the 4 mm difference in backspacing causes your torque converter to push on the transmission pump, breaking it. I've seen two people on forums do that by mistake. If you use a 4.0 long block don't be tempted to leave the 4.0 flexplate on.

Worked fine for me.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 07, 2012, 11:31:55 PM
All Automatic XJ's have AW4 transmissions. Some Grand Cherokees and Wranglers had a 4.0 in front of a compatible flexplate from a transmission that wasn't an AW4. Its the same flexplate to look for if you're trying to do a fancy CPS modification on a TF998.

It's just the AW4 flexplate that absolutely will damage your transmission if you drive with it for too long. If you know you have an XJ flexplate in front of your Eagle TF998 get ready for the transmission to give out.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: mudkicker715 on September 08, 2012, 12:25:28 AM
All Automatic XJ's have AW4 transmissions. Some Grand Cherokees and Wranglers had a 4.0 in front of a compatible flexplate from a transmission that wasn't an AW4. Its the same flexplate to look for if you're trying to do a fancy CPS modification on a TF998.

It's just the AW4 flexplate that absolutely will damage your transmission if you drive with it for too long. If you know you have an XJ flexplate in front of your Eagle TF998 get ready for the transmission to give out.

i drove for about 4 years with no damaging results on that setup.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 08, 2012, 02:00:40 AM
No adapter for 4.0L to 4.2L trans or front axle. Change the oil pan from the 4.0L to the one from the 4.2L, clean the axle mount holes in the block before installing.
Good to know.
So I could drop a 4.0 right in onto the auto-trans, using the 258 intake for the carb, using the 4.0 exhaust manifold patched into the 258 exhaust.
Understand only issue should be mounting the power steering pump?

Not all 4.2Ls can be bored (need to check for core shift)
Now you're scaring me. What is core shift?

For the cam, if you plan EFI later, use the aftermarket performance one or the ping monster will haunt you.
No EFI planned.
4.2L intake needs minor mods to bolt to 4.0L head. Just renotching where it attaches to the head so the intake ports are covered by the carbed intake.

PS bolts on and you have the choice between 4.2L stuff (swap all 4.2L accessories including balancer) or use the 4.0L accessories (leave the EFI intake and make/buy an adapter for your carb to it)

There is no fuel pump or spot on the 4.0L block so electric pump is needed.

Core shift is when they poured the motor block, the sand they used for the sleeves moved during pouring, leaving thin spots (sonic check of the block is needed when boring over 0.030)
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 08, 2012, 02:02:26 AM
My 1/2" head has the plastic valve cover.

Sounds to me like you think you have 1/2" bolts but actually have 7/16" bolts, especially since your Eagle is a 1982. They look so darn close. Try putting a tap on them and you'll know for sure. I confuse my 4.0 head bolts all the time as 4.2 bolts.

An even easier test is to take the accessory head bolt and take the nut at the top and try it on the threads at the bottom. If the threads are exactly the same top and bottom its 7/16". If its different its 1/2" bottom and 7/16" top. Those are the only two possible combinations since 4.0 head bolts still used 7/16" threads at the top compatible with all the old 4.2 hardware. A 4.2 would have at least one of those double ended head bolts at the front of the driver side for attaching a Vbelt pulley and a 4.0 would have at least three of them for the wiring harness plastic box to snap to.

I'm pretty sure all plastic valve cover engines are the lightened 1981 to early 1987 blocks with 7/16 headbolts. I guess its plausible that someone used a 1988 short block and the 1982 head with the holes slightly enlarged, but it's much more likely you're just wrong about your own head bolts.

I use an open end wrench to see what size the bolts are.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 08, 2012, 02:05:06 AM
All Automatic XJ's have AW4 transmissions. Some Grand Cherokees and Wranglers had a 4.0 in front of a compatible flexplate from a transmission that wasn't an AW4. Its the same flexplate to look for if you're trying to do a fancy CPS modification on a TF998.

It's just the AW4 flexplate that absolutely will damage your transmission if you drive with it for too long. If you know you have an XJ flexplate in front of your Eagle TF998 get ready for the transmission to give out.

All 4.0L XJs are AW4. 4 cyl and 2.8 V6 are 904 till '88
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Draekon on September 08, 2012, 01:38:12 PM
... The 258 block can be overbored to 4.5
I'm stuck on the road, so adding in the adaptor to put a 4.0 block onto my trans along with finding a 4.0 block... I already have the 258 block sitting here.


A 258 block:
stock, is 4.2
over bored 030 is ______?
over bored ___ is 4.5

So I tell the shop I want it over-bored by ____ to ____ to get 4.5?

Stock cam or otherwise?



Stock bore is 4.235 liters
Overbored .030 gives 4.303 liters
Overbored .060 gives 4.371 liters

In order to get 4.5 liters, you need to overbore your motor by .120, which is quite a lot for most motors.  You would have to get the block sonic checked to make sure there is enough material to do it.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 08, 2012, 01:42:16 PM
I use an open end wrench to see what size the bolts are.

7/16" is the tap size of the threads, not the nut hex head size. Both 1/2" and 7/16" head bolts use the same size hex head.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 08, 2012, 01:45:20 PM
Stock bore is 4.235 liters
Overbored .030 gives 4.303 liters
Overbored .060 gives 4.371 liters

In order to get 4.5 liters, you need to overbore your motor by .120, which is quite a lot for most motors.  You would have to get the block sonic checked to make sure there is enough material to do it.

What formulas and given values did you use to calculate that?

What are the numbers for stroker combinations using 4.0 blocks and 258 cranks with no overbore, .30 and .60 overbore on the 4.0 block?
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Draekon on September 08, 2012, 05:23:24 PM
Stock bore is 4.235 liters
Overbored .030 gives 4.303 liters
Overbored .060 gives 4.371 liters

In order to get 4.5 liters, you need to overbore your motor by .120, which is quite a lot for most motors.  You would have to get the block sonic checked to make sure there is enough material to do it.

What formulas and given values did you use to calculate that?

What are the numbers for stroker combinations using 4.0 blocks and 258 cranks with no overbore, .30 and .60 overbore on the 4.0 block?

A stock 258 has a bore of 3.75", and a stroke of 3.90"

Engine size is just the displacement created by the pistons in the cylinders, so you just need  to calculate the volume of a cylinder (or 6 in the case of a I6)

So for a stock motor:
Volume of a cylinder is height*pi*radius^2, or height*pi/4 *diameter^2
Bore is equivalent to diameter, so we have 3.9 *3.14159/4 * 3.75^2 = 43.074 cu in per cylinder.
Take this number and multiply it by the 6 cylinders, and you get 258.445 cu in total displacement.

You can then convert that number to liters by using a conversion factor, or by going to google and typing in "258 cubic inches to liters".

If you want to calculate the volume if you bore the motor, you just add however much you are boring the cylinders out to the original bore.  For example, if you bore the motor .030, you are increasing the bore of the cylinder to 3.780".

If you increase the bore by .120", making it 3.870", you get a 4.5L motor.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: profeagle on September 08, 2012, 10:26:55 PM
You have to run the 1/2" head bolts to get 110 ft lbs. The early/mid '80s 4.2L ran 7/16" which will shear off before 110 ft lbs.
Mine's an '86 Eagle, but the head bolts are 1/2", making me suspect it's not the original block.

No worries, 1/2" bolts started with the 86 model. Same as the one that I have which is original engine !
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 10, 2012, 10:26:38 AM
I use an open end wrench to see what size the bolts are.

7/16" is the tap size of the threads, not the nut hex head size. Both 1/2" and 7/16" head bolts use the same size hex head.

Guess I didn't completely explain that (blame it on the pain drugs!) Use the open end wrench on the SHAFT of the headbolt to determine it's side.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: Canoe on September 10, 2012, 01:59:22 PM
Sounds to me like you think you have 1/2" bolts but actually have 7/16" bolts, especially since your Eagle is a 1982.
...its 1/2" bottom and 7/16" top. Those are the only two possible combinations since 4.0 head bolts still used 7/16" threads at the top compatible with all the old 4.2 hardware. A 4.2 would have at least one of those double ended head bolts at the front of the driver side for attaching a Vbelt pulley...
I don't know how mhy '86 ended up that way, but the bolts are 1/2", with three of them having the 7/16" top threaded. Two are for the belt idler bracket; I didn't notice what the third was for but it's sitting on the bench.

Now I have to get back to digesting all the rest.

Thanks all!
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 10, 2012, 06:33:47 PM
No worries, 1/2" bolts started with the 86 model. Same as the one that I have which is original engine !

Interesting. I was the one who confused the two then. I had a 1987 head off and I thought I was holding 7/16" bolts. That means 1/2" head bolts are available that are not "torque to yield." I wonder if I could use a low mileage set of Eagle head bolts in the high mileage 4.0 I'm about to put new rings into.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: profeagle on September 10, 2012, 07:15:26 PM
The short answer is "yes" you can, at least in my opinion and that of my machine shop/engine re-builder. We had some discusion about that and he said it would be OK and indeed the old bolts worked just fine.
I put a 4L. head on 86 258 block. Engine totally gone over and modified.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: carnuck on September 13, 2012, 09:17:25 PM
4.0L headbolts and 1/2" 4.2L headbolts are the same EXCEPT for the accessory studs on some 4.2L bolts.
Title: Re: boring 258 block for a 4.0 head
Post by: captspillane on September 14, 2012, 10:34:22 AM
4.0L headbolts and 1/2" 4.2L headbolts are the same EXCEPT for the accessory studs on some 4.2L bolts.

They are dimensionally exactly the same but they might not be the same. Torque to yield bolts are designed to have a very specific Yield Point because of the way the metal is treated. The change in metal properties of the bolts should correspond with the change in recommended torque values.